Seven solutions for climate change and creating a new energy economy

Clean Energy

Clean Energy

Once upon a time, the Soviet Union was threatening to be the first country to put a man on the moon. The president galvanized the nation to meet the challenge, and Americans got there first. The end.

The story of clean energy could follow a similar script. Global warming is a far larger and realer threat than a Soviet lunar landing ever was, but a similar sense of national mission is missing, even though developing reliable and abundant sources of clean energy is the next lunar landing, the next great leap for both America and humankind.

Unfortunately, clean energy has no space agency to support it. It is still a minuscule corner of business enterprise, without the influence of an industrial-strength lobby. It's interests are fragmented - the sun, the wind, the oceans, the heat in the bowels of the earth. And although the US Department of Energy had sunk billions into clean tech R&D over recent decades, the resulting innovations have only found life in foreign countries. Germany, for example, adopted smart tax and business incentives that encouraged the flowering of clean energy on a mass scale. It now generates a substantial portion of its energy for free. Not so in the US. It's been pretty much government support for coal, oil and gas all the way.

It's too bad. With government support, clean energy could supply 20% of the nation's electricity needs by 2020 and keep $350 in the bank for a typical American family every year, with nary a wisp of smoke. It would also mean new dirty coal plants would no longer be needed, and old ones could be bulldozed, and that the US would have technology to export -- to countries like China and India. Imagine that.

Too good to be true? See what you think after looking at this clean energy blueprint.

Register or login to subscribe to updates from solve climate

Jargon Watch

A C E G All
  • The energy that has to replace the burning of fossil fuels, because we have no alternative, now that global warming is upon us.

    Also referred to as clean energy, because it is untainted by petro-politics, and as renewable energy, because you never run out of it (and so never have to fight wars over it.)

  • As Mr. Portokalos says in My Big Fat Greek Wedding, "Give me any word, and I show you the root of that word is Greek." He can even do it with "kimono", so anthropogenic -- close cousin of anthropology -- should be easy for us. It means "caused by human activity."

    In relation to global warming, anthropogenic emissions are the gases, most notably carbon dioxide, that we humans have pumped into the air, especially over the last 150 years of modern industrial life, without giving it a thought, as if the atmosphere has the limitless capacity to absorb our waste. It doesn't.

  • Here's what the Competitive Enterprise Institute had to say about it in their ad campaign:

    "Carbon Dioxide: they call it pollution; we call it life."

    It was probably one of the most ridiculed ad campaigns of recent memory. Last word has to go to Rafael Baptista, who posted this comment on Gristmill.

    "How about you make a campaign called 'Uric Acid. They call it urine. We call it lemonade.'"

  • The best way to understand the role of China in America's global warming debate is to understand the function it plays in the national psyche. Here's one analysis.

    America has made China the victim of its own psychological projection, a defense mechanism in which one blames others for one's own unacceptable attributes.

    So rather than take responsibility for being far and away the world's biggest global warming polluters on a per capita basis, Americans have been duped into pointing the finger at China.

  • Think of a dormant volcano. It's got a cap on it.

    An emissions cap is a similar idea. It's a legally binding mandate that puts a lid on greenhouse gas emissions, and slowly lowers it over time.

    The science clearly tells us where to put the lid, what the maximum amount of allowable emissions should be. Science describes this point in many different ways, but the easiest formulation is this:

    Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2% every year.

    Otherwise, like a volcano, the climate will erupt in unpredictable fury.

  • Long before treehuggers roamed the Earth, the greenhouse effect was scientifically investigated and confirmed.

    First discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1829, the greenhouse effect works by reducing the amount of heat the planet loses to the cold of outer space. It's a good thing. It is what makes life on Earth possible. Without it, the surface of the planet would be as much as 30 degrees centigrade -- or more than 80 degrees fahrenheit -- colder.

A C E G All

Related Posts