The Military

The Military

The current Commander in Chief of the armed forces has not been one to take global warming seriously. So down the chain of command, nobody is going to say boo about it. It violates the code of conduct at the foundation of military discipline. But what are we to make of eleven 3-star and 4-star admirals and generals who, upon retirement, found it incumbent upon themselves to sound an urgent alarm about global warming?

Take a look for yourself at "National Security and the Threat of Climate Change." The authors, all with more than 30 years of military service, much of it during the Cold War, view global warming as a national security risk as big as any the nation has ever faced. That's not the position they started when they began their analyzing the problem.

They began by receiving a briefing from Jim Hansen,

"arguably one of the top scientists in the world, in the United States, certainly. And he never got through the first sentence and we were attacking him. I think that's my shorthand of saying that we all came to this with a certain degree of skepticism."

Those were the words of the General Gordon Sullivan before the Council on Foreign Relations. By the time their six month study of the problem concluded, they were convinced the risks posed by global warming to national security were "high" and "potentially catastrophic."

Why? One of their key findings sums up the answer: "Climate change, national security and energy dependence are a related set of global challenges."

As the strong arm of the US government in the geo-politics of petroleum, these military men are seeing that global warming is going to make their assignment more demanding than ever before, and are calling for an urgent response.

Register or login to subscribe to updates from solve climate

Resources

WMO 2007 GHG Bulletin (Report)

This 4-page bulletin from the World Meterological Organization reports on GHG levels in 2006, the highest on record.

California Green Innovation Index (Report)

This report from Next 10 explains how and why California has grown its robust economy for three decades AND is still greener than any other state. Contains big lessons for federal climate policy.

National Security and the Threat of Climate Change (Report)

In this report, a group of retired three- and four-star generals and admirals says global warming could provoke serious national security threats. Among the recommendations: to integrate climate change into national security and national defense strategies, and for the US to help stabilize climate change at levels that will avoid significant disruption to global security and stability.

Clean Energy Blueprint (Report)

This report from the Union of Concerned Scientists outlines the policies needed to meet at least 20 percent of America's electricity needs from renewable sources by 2020. The measures would save consumers a total of $440 billion, reduce use of coal by nearly 60 percent, and avoid the need for new power plants.

How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor (Report)

It takes 450 pounds of corn to produce enough ethanol to fill the 25-gallon gas tank of an SUV. That corn also contains enough calories to feed one person for one year. This article from Foreign Affairs shines a light on unintended consequences of the US rush to produce and consume biofuels to replace dependence on foreign oil.

Related Posts