Judges Shoot Down “Big Stone Coal Plant,” Say Renewables are Cheaper

The murky future of South Dakota’s Big Stone II coal plant is getting even murkier.
In Minnesota, two administrative law judges have ruled against the building of the power lines that Big Stone II needs to run, overturning a recommendation they made last year.
Why? Because the five power companies trying to build it couldn’t justify the need for hundreds of new megawatts of the dirty fuel.
Not when the judges considered the rising costs -- the four million tons of CO2 pollution each year plus rate hikes for Minnesota customers after a federal price on carbon kicks in that forces coal polluters to pay.
The better bet for the state, say the judges? Renewable energy. Mainly wind, and efficiency measures.
Huge.
The coal plant has been proposed to sit on the South Dakota side of Big Stone Lake, a few miles from Minnesota’s western border.
Ixnay on the Minnesota transmission lines means ixnay on the whole $1.6 billion shebang.
Next chapter? The Minnesota Public Utilities (PUC) has to decide whether to adopt the judges’ ruling. If it does, the project is dead.
What are the odds of that happening? Here’s Michael Noble’s take, executive director of Fresh Energy, one of the five groups that testified against the power lines:
It would be almost impossible for the state commission to approve this coal plant now after years of testimony and evidence show that efficiency and renewable are better for Minnesota consumers.
The court’s full recommendation is here (pdf).
Expect the PUC to rule on it in July '08, says Noble.
What a perfect month for PUC to fire off a victory for American energy independence -- one that helps to deliver its state and others out of the hands of fossil fuel interests and toward a responsible posture on global warming.
We'll see if that happens.
If it doesn't, South Dakota, at least, will be firmly in the shackles of dirty energy --- with a new mega-plant that will single-handedly double the state’s carbon pollution from coal.
In fact, it will pump out the same amount of CO2 emissions that are produced from all of South Dakota's cars, trucks and trains.
The judges clearly didn't want that dark coal stain on their records. Bets are that the PUC doesn't either.











Post new comment