The Jury's Still Out on Obama and Liquid Coal

From Obama's lofty new energy plan:
We must invest in clean coal technologies that we can use at home and share with the world. Until those technologies are available, I will rely on the carbon cap and whatever tools are necessary to stop new dirty coal plants from being built in America -- including a ban on new traditional coal facilities.
A ban on new traditional coal plants. Wow. A sea change for Obama. Impressive. And not a single mention of liquid coal, liquefied coal, coal-to-liquid (or any word that begins with "liq" for that matter) in Obama's entire plan.
The WaPo's "The Trail" implies that the lack of mention means he's against coal-to-liquid. That he's officially silenced his critics.
But why the assumption? Can we really safely say that Obama is 100 percent against liquefying coal, no exceptions? That he's turned his back on his pro-coal past, and the subsidies for liquid coal that he backed just a few months ago?
The truth is, we can't. Not until he says it, in his own words, in plain English. Until then, the jury's still out.
John Edwards said it. Kind of makes you wonder why Obama chose not to even mention the words, in a ten-page plan so chock full of policy details.












Post new comment